Your feedback drives the Concourse roadmap! Review and vote for existing ideas or submit new ideas.
For immediate technical support, please follow this guidance to open a Service Now ticket.
Currently, only one group can be assigned to a deliverable, but that is not reflective of regular product organization. It would be helpful to be able to link multiple workstreams to one deliverable.
| Workspace Territory | United States |
Hey Klinttin, I'm sad to say that we haven't progressed on this feature or much of what is listed in our idea portal. Concourse is developing toward a goal of a global rollout this spring and it has consumed nearly all of our development capacity. Comprehensive research and planning has been done against this request and it's listed as a top adoption killer for the platform in our backlog. I'll be sure to post here again if we're able to commit this to build.
What's the status of this?
Thank you for submitting this idea - we’re excited to see the interest it generated! We recently established a Concourse research team that is completely focused on exploring user generated ideas like this. They recently released this survey to gather additional feedback. If you haven't already done so, please respond to the survey so we can move this idea forward! Thank you in advance!
KYLE, are you getting this?
To expand on my previous comment here are two use cases:
RAID item use case - lets say we have a decision out for whether or not we want to enforce timecard entry for doctors (always a contentious topic) that decision needs to be made by the timekeeping team, but it will directly impact HCM and Payroll so all three workstreams need to be tagged on the decision for visibility. We have hundreds of RAID items so I can't expect teams to review things that aren't tagged to them
This same concept can be applied to our deliverables as well. One example would be Prototype 1. That is a deliverable, but if I was forced to actually assign it to only one workstream I'd need 4 deliverables in Concourse and Jira for HCM, FIN, SCM, & Payroll. This would exponentially increase our deliverable listing in Concourse, and wouldn't be contractually accurate
This would be one of the most helpful things conceivable for the integration with Jira. Right now we have half a dozen projects using work arounds and inconsistent workstream fields to be able to accomodate the necessity of multiple workstreams. As Concourse rolls out the RAID log this only becomes more necessary.